From blackouts in South Africa to oil collapse in Venezuela, DEI-style policies are leaving destruction in their wake. Trump’s executive orders just declared war on this trend.
Heike Claudia Petzer
Jan 31, 2025 - 3:00 PM
Share
President Trump has declared war on DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), signing executive orders to eliminate it from the military, government, and education. Unsurprisingly, DEI advocates are furious. But for everyday Americans, this is a much-needed correction to a system that has done more harm than good.
History proves that when race-based and ideological hiring replace merit, society collapses. Just look at South Africa and Venezuela: two stark warnings of what happens when DEI policies go unchecked.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies may sound good at first, but in practice, they've lowered standards, fueled division, and prioritized political agendas over excellence and talent.
In the Military: DEI initiatives undermine cohesion by prioritizing identity-based policies over combat preparedness, raising questions about their long-term impact on the strength and unity of the U.S. military.
In Workplaces: Companies hired DEI consultants and implemented quotas, only to lay them off later as the programs failed. Even tech giants like Google and Meta quietly let go of thousands of DEI employees after realizing they contributed little to company success. In January 2025, uncontrolled fires in Los Angeles and an aircraft crash were reportedly linked to DEI-related layoffs and unqualified personnel.
In Education: Schools and universities scrapped entrance exams to promote equity, resulting in lower academic standards. The outcome? A generation that’s unprepared, unqualified, and unable to compete in the real world. Reverse discrimination and forced equality of outcomes have completely undermined merit-based systems.
President Trump’s policies aim to restore merit-based hiring, promotions and to remove ideological activism from institutions. To truly understand why this is so crucial, we need to look at extreme examples of what happens when DEI is taken too far.
If there’s a glaring example of how DEI policies can destroy an economy, it’s South Africa. After the fall of Apartheid, the government introduced Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE), which was meant to uplift black South Africans and right the wrongs of history. Instead, it became a system that fostered corruption, racial discrimination, and economic decline.
Mandatory Black Ownership: In South Africa, companies are required to meet Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) requirements, which often include minimum black ownership targets of around 30%. Critics argue this prioritizes demographic targets over qualifications or industry expertise.
Government Collapses: State-run companies like Eskom, the national power utility, have long suffered from political appointments and mismanagement. This has contributed to widespread blackouts and the country’s ongoing energy crisis.
Political Appointees Fail: Transnet, responsible for railways and harbors, has been weakened by years of poor leadership and corruption scandals, leading to severe supply chain disruptions.
Corruption Reigns: Major state contracts are frequently linked to patronage networks, nepotism, and corruption scandals, raising concerns that deals are too often awarded based on connections or kickbacks rather than merit.
South African Airways (SAA) and Mango Airways Bankruptcies: South African Airways has repeatedly faced bankruptcy, requiring multiple government bailouts, similar to Mango Airways. Investigations and reporting have highlighted how political interference, mismanagement, and cadre deployment undermined the airline’s ability to operate efficiently.
The system has contributed to widespread job losses among skilled white South Africans, many of whom have struggled to find new opportunities. This represents a situation where skin color became a determining factor rather than ability or expertise.
South Africa still has the potential to rise again if merit-based hiring and competence are prioritized. Yet the legacy of race-based employment and education policies has already left deep scars. The public education system, for example, allows learners to pass with a minimum grade of just 30%, a threshold widely criticized for lowering standards and weakening the long-term prospects of the workforce.
One of the most absurd examples of DEI’s damage was the Starlink ban. Elon Musk’s plan to bring affordable, high-speed internet to South Africa through Starlink was blocked by the government, unless Musk found a black business partner to hold 30% ownership.
As a result, South Africans, particularly those in rural areas, are left with expensive and unreliable internet options or mobile data. At the same time, neighboring countries like Zimbabwe and Zambia enjoy the benefits of Starlink.
South Africa, a nation prosperous in potential, is now grappling with a broken infrastructure, soaring unemployment, violent crime rates worse than active war zones, and an endless cycle of corruption. All of these issues are exacerbated by DEI policies that place skin color above competence. Under the current leadership, South Africa is spiraling down a dangerous path.
Venezuela's collapse is a tragic example of what happens when "equity" is prioritized over merit. In the early 2000s, Hugo Chávez’s radical socialist policies, eerily similar to today’s DEI agenda, set the stage for disaster:
Nationalization of industries: Chávez handed over businesses to “underrepresented” groups, despite their lack of training and expertise.
DEI policies at PDVSA: The state-run oil company was gutted by DEI hiring, resulting in the destruction of one of the world’s most successful oil industries.
Meritocracy dismantled: Venezuela’s most skilled professionals - engineers, doctors, and business owners - fled the country, leaving an unqualified workforce behind.
The consequences, a ruined economy, widespread starvation, and millions of people fleeing. Inflation and poverty skyrocketed, and once-thriving cities descended into chaos. Today, Venezuela stands as one of the poorest, most dangerous nations in the world.
President Trump’s fight against DEI is not about rejecting diversity; it’s about restoring fairness and preventing America from following the disastrous paths of South Africa and Venezuela.
Diversity should emerge naturally through merit, not by quotas or force. When hiring and promotion are dictated by ideology instead of ability, the result is incompetence, resentment, and, eventually, national decline. The damaging effects of DEI are already taking hold in America, leaving behind some irreversible scars.
When meritocracy is tossed aside in favor of appeasing a certain demographic, the consequences ripple across every sector, weakening the nation as a whole.
Share
Heike Claudia Petzer
Content Writer