A warning from South Africa: how state collapse, racial scapegoating, and failed “restorative justice” are fueling division and resentment while the West follows the same path. Just one generation behind.
Heike Claudia Petzer
Mar 27, 2025 - 2:29 PM
Share


South Africa is heading towards a new era of centralised control, state dependency, and ideological warfare with signs of communism disguised as “restorative justice.” For those of us who live here, it’s obvious. What’s terrifying is that many in the West are blind to the fact that they are walking one generation behind us on the same path.
Our ruling elite speaks openly about accelerated land redistribution, not as a threat but as an “opportunity.” The rhetoric is not about coexistence but about ownership, race, and entitlement. The messaging from politicians is designed to stir envy and to pit poor against rich, black against white in exchange for votes. It’s not about building a nation; it’s about fracturing one.
Stefan Tompson, founder of Visegrád24, recently visited South Africa and spoke to Afrikaner political commentator Willem Petzer. Their conversation cuts to the heart of the crisis as we look at clips of South African Black Land First leader Andile Mngxitama saying, “For each one person that the taxi industry has killed, we kill five white people.”
Remarks and incitement to violence like this have resulted in a country where white farmers are being murdered at an alarming rate, where 95% of these murders go unsolved, and where people like Petzer are smeared for simply calling attention to it amid slogans like “Shoot to kill the farmer! Kill the Boer!”

These struggle-song slogans go unpunished, reflecting a more profound, dangerous shift, not only in rhetoric but in the fabric of society itself. As trust in public institutions erodes and violence becomes normalized, those who can afford it turn to private solutions such as gated communities, armed response, and private medical care, effectively insulating themselves from a collapsing public system.
But this survival instinct breeds deep resentment. For millions who are trapped in poverty, abandoned by the state, and unable to access even essential services, the sight of private wealth feels like a daily insult. “Under those conditions,” says Petzer, “I would also be envious and angry.” But the anger isn’t directed at the corrupt elite or the dysfunctional government. Instead, it’s channeled by politicians and media toward white people, who are framed as the eternal scapegoats. “Because the ones truly responsible,” he continues, “keep repeating that it’s the white man’s fault.”
Poverty doesn’t just create hunger; it creates hatred. When people live without hope, with no path to dignity or upward mobility, they become vulnerable to ideologies that offer a target for their pain and suffering. That’s why crime in South Africa so often carries the tone of rage. It’s not just theft, it’s vengeance. It's not just murder, it’s a message. That message doesn’t stop at South Africa’s borders. The same forces: grievance politics, identity resentment, and institutional decay are beginning to surface elsewhere.
What is 'South Africanisation'? It’s a term that hasn’t gone mainstream yet, but it’s becoming increasingly visible. When we examine political trends in the West, particularly on social media, it becomes clear that the West is about a generation behind South Africa.
In the 1990s, many white South Africans embraced liberalism and pragmatism. Many Afrikaners believed in reconciliation. They supported affirmative action, black economic empowerment, and even positive discrimination. They even thought, “Yes, that’s fair. The system was unjust; let’s fix it.” Restorative justice was written into our Constitution. It stated that discrimination based on race or sex was unacceptable unless it was “positive discrimination” to correct past injustices. However, what started as a temporary measure evolved into something more perilous.
There is a fear that the West is making the same mistake. They’re adopting restorative justice not just in policy but embedding it deeply into law and culture. Black Economic Empowerment, for example, was initially intended to conclude in 2012. Instead, it expanded. Every year, more racial laws are passed. According to the Free Market Foundation, South Africa now has six times more racial laws than during apartheid. What began as an effort to correct historical injustice has metastasized into a bureaucratic system of permanent division, one that rewards loyalty over competence and ideology over results. The same framework meant to uplift the disadvantaged has, paradoxically, entrenched corruption and dependency.
The man who helped shape the post-apartheid state was Joe Slovo, a radical communist who treated Marxism like gospel. Since 1994, the African National Congress has ruled in coalition with the South African Communist Party, a partnership that still defines the country’s political DNA. They call themselves communists, much like the old Soviet Union, but there’s one crucial difference.
South Africans, in a darkly humorous way, might even count that as a blessing. It’s better to be misgoverned by Cyril Ramaphosa than terrorized by Joseph Stalin. Our communists are too incompetent to implement communism. Their ideology may be textbook Marxist, but South Africa is not a communist country , not because they lack the will, but because they lack the capacity to pull it off.
This ideological failure has produced something uniquely South African, a government powerful enough to control but too dysfunctional to serve.
South Africans live in a parallel state. In theory, they have free healthcare. In practice, it’s unusable. Billions are poured into it, but nothing improves. The money is mismanaged, and the system is broken. Private citizens and companies have quietly taken over key state functions, maintaining roads, providing security, even running utilities.

You can see it everywhere. Drive out to the farms, and you’ll find pristine roads not because the government fixed them, but because farmers paid out of pocket to do so. Those who can afford it live in a first-world oasis; those who can’t are left behind in a collapsing third-world system.
We now have two South Africans living side by side, one built by private citizens, the other falling apart under state control. It is the natural outcome of ideology meeting incompetence. As South Africa moves deeper into it, the West should pay attention - not with pity, but with urgency. Learn from us before it’s too late.
Share
Heike Claudia Petzer
Content Writer