What’s behind the debate over Trump-era Ukraine aid, and how did it affect the frontline? A US veteran explains.
Benjamin Reed
Jul 31, 2025 - 7:44 PM
Share
President Donald Trump appears to have finally removed his rose-tinted view of Vladimir Putin. Speaking today from Turnberry, Trump gave the Kremlin “10 to 12 days” to halt its war and agree to a ceasefire. The original 50-day timeline, already a concession, has now been compressed, reportedly out of frustration with continued Russian strikes on Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities. But if Trump has truly abandoned his illusions, he must abandon the notion that Vladimir Putin is swayed by deadlines. The only message Moscow understands is force.
Barbaric eastern despotism is not reasoned with, it is restrained. And not with warnings or hollow trade ultimatums, but with Western firepower, delivered through the hands of Ukrainian soldiers. It has taken hundreds of thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of drones to transmit the message: Russia does not respond to persuasion. It responds to pain.
Yet even as Trump attempts to recast himself as a born-again hawk, his administration’s actual record, and that of his former vice president, demands scrutiny. Trump once described Putin as a “genius” for launching a full-scale invasion of a sovereign country. And now Mike Pence, angling for relevance, is trying to whitewash that chapter into something heroic.
In a recent Forbes interview, Pence claimed the Trump administration supplied both Javelins and Stingers to Ukraine. It’s a distortion of history. Yes, the administration approved Javelin transfers but under restrictions so severe they stripped the weapons of strategic value before the full-scale invasion. Stored in western Ukraine and kept away from the Donbas, those systems functioned more as set pieces than deterrents.
The Javelin was not built for storage. It was built to kill Russian armor. Early deployment near the front lines would have sent a resounding signal, not just to Moscow, but to the world that the United States stood ready to defend Ukrainian sovereignty with credible tools and real intent. Instead, they were used for show. That is not policy. That is theatre.
More egregious is Pence’s claim about Stinger missiles. It’s not just misleading, it’s false. No official record, Pentagon manifest, or Ukrainian source confirms Stinger deliveries under Trump. The first confirmed transfers came in 2022, under Biden, as part of the emergency response to the invasion. Pence is not confused. He is rewriting history to serve a political afterlife.
These distortions matter. In 2022, I was on the ground in Ukraine. Volunteers fought with wooden-stock Kalashnikovs and off-the-shelf drones. We counted every shell, every tourniquet, every wasted week of Western ambiguity. These weren’t policy disputes. They were felt in collapsed defensive lines, amputations that could’ve been avoided, and funerals that should’ve been postponed by years.
To be clear, credit is due: the Trump team has now authorized a $10 billion weapons package. That is necessary. What is not acceptable is the accompanying diplomatic pageantry, a vague ceasefire offer with a two-week grace period, cloaked in the threat of “eventual” sanctions. That is not diplomacy. It’s deferral.
The Kremlin doesn’t need time to reconsider. It has already decided. Russia has adapted to sanctions, hardened its economy, and built fiscal defenses designed to outlast moral pressure. Elvira Nabiullina, head of the Central Bank, deserves her due: she has reengineered Russia’s economic war machine with clinical precision. The ruble stabilized, capital controls tightened, sanctions absorbed and rerouted.
This is not an adversary waiting to be persuaded. It is one preparing for the long war. Moscow is prepared to continue fighting throughout the summer fighting season and well into next year.
So no, there is no time to wait. No deadline to extend. No fiction to entertain. Trump may well be sincere in his shift, but sincerity is irrelevant if it leads to the wrong strategy. What’s needed now is not rhetorical muscle but operational power. Aid must flow now. Sanctions must hit now. And narratives, especially those told by former leaders, must be honest not because history demands it, but because future lives depend on it.
History isn’t a parable. It’s a ledger. And in war, every lie is paid for in blood.
Share
Benjamin Reed
American Veteran