The Al Jazeera Deception

The Power of a PR Machine

Qatar’s well-oiled, billion-dollar public relations machine quietly shapes global narratives, often without us even noticing. Since its launch in 1996, Al Jazeera has positioned itself as a beacon of independent journalism across 150 countries, reaching 430 million viewers worldwide.

But behind this polished facade lies a stark reality: a state-run broadcaster that shifts its message to suit different audiences, defending extremists in one language while accusing others of bias in another.

António Corrêa, Portugal’s former ambassador to Qatar, recently described this reach as a new kind of “Caliphate,” reflecting Qatar’s growing soft power driven by vast natural gas wealth and a fundamentalist regime. Its influence penetrates deep into the West, where significant investments in infrastructure, education, and sports mask a broader geopolitical agenda.

A prime example is Al Jazeera Balkans, Qatar’s largest foreign-language outlet after Al Jazeera English, which serves as a direct extension of Doha’s ambitions. In Sarajevo, the visible rise of conservative Islamic dress and ideology underscores Qatar’s push to promote political Islam and reshape local identities.

But Qatar’s reach does not stop at the Balkans. Its influence across Europe is vast, extending from football stadiums to the corridors of political power. These concerns came into sharper focus during the 2022 'Qatargate' scandal, which exposed alleged Qatari efforts to bribe EU officials in order to silence criticism of its human rights record, highlighting the depth of Doha’s penetration into European institutions.

Banned Across the Middle East

Across the Middle East, Al Jazeera has long been regarded as a powerful tool of Qatari state propaganda. In 2017, several Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Egypt, cut diplomatic ties with Qatar and banned Al Jazeera from broadcasting within their borders.

Each country had its own grievances. In Saudi Arabia, Al Jazeera was accused of undermining American and Saudi efforts to counter Iran, while giving favorable coverage to Hezbollah and Hamas. In the UAE, the network was blamed for misrepresenting official statements and falsely suggesting Emirati involvement in plots against Qatar. In Bahrain, Al Jazeera ran incendiary reports attacking the kingdom’s human rights record. In Egypt, the network was widely seen as playing a pivotal role during the Arab Spring which briefly brought the Muslim Brotherhood to power. Three of the network’s journalists were later sentenced to 10 years in prison for allegedly collaborating with the outlawed group.

It’s not just Arab states. Countries including the Maldives, Mauritania, Senegal, Jordan, and the Bangladeshi Federal Union of Journalists have all pushed for bans or restrictions on Al Jazeera. And in May 2024, Israel joined the list making global headlines by unanimously voting to shut down Al Jazeera’s offices. The move followed mounting evidence that some of the network’s journalists were collaborating with Hamas, even as Qatar continues to host the group’s leadership in Doha and grants Al Jazeera reporters privileged access to Gaza.

Not Just a News Network

Al Jazeera functions as the mouthpiece of a conservative Wahhabi regime controlled by a single family. It wields state funding to advance Qatar’s geopolitical interests, often exploiting Western media freedoms to amplify radical ideologies.

This influence reaches Western sympathizers, some of whom have joined extremist groups — notably the approximately 5,000 Europeans who joined ISIS. The tragic case of Shamima Begum, a British teenager who fled to Syria to become a jihadi bride, contrasts sharply with figures like Lauren Booth, Tony Blair’s sister-in-law.

Booth, an actress-turned-journalist, traveled to Gaza in 2008 with George Galloway, accepted an honorary Palestinian passport from Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, converted to Islam, and later produced for Al Jazeera in London. Booth also served as a trustee for the UK charity Peacetrail, which was dissolved after a Charity Commission investigation found over £200,000 unaccounted for, including £70,000 sent to an individual in Palestine without documentation. The charity’s priorities closely aligned with Qatari foreign policy.

Begum was exiled and erased from British society, while Booth remains active in media and advocacy without facing consequences. Why this double standard?

Europe’s Double Standard

The EU’s response to foreign media influence has been inconsistent. After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Russian state outlets like RT and Sputnik were swiftly banned across the bloc. Yet Al Jazeera, a well-known vehicle for Qatari foreign policy, continues to operate freely. Critics, including Spanish MEP Jorge Buxadé, have argued that if RT is deemed dangerous enough to warrant a ban, then Al Jazeera, which serves radical Islamist narratives and aligns with extremist interests, should face similar scrutiny.

Western governments are increasingly held captive by powerful lobbyists, allowing a subversive minority to exploit that weakness and undermine the foundations of liberal democracy. But banning state-sponsored media is complex. Czech MEP Alexandr Vondra suggested that in times of war, if Al Jazeera operates as a media arm for groups like Hamas, restricting its activities could be justified. However, he cautioned that such measures must be approached carefully.

While the solution may involve restrictions or censorship in some cases, it is equally important to strengthen institutions, build societal resilience, and, as German MEP Dennis Radtke has emphasized, work closely with Muslim communities to help counter radical ideologies.

Adam Starzynski

Journalist | Foreign Policy Analyst

Find out more